<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fan-sourcing filmmaker creativity: a counterpoint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewmcmillen.com/2009/11/07/fan-sourcing-filmmaker-creativity-a-counterpoint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewmcmillen.com/2009/11/07/fan-sourcing-filmmaker-creativity-a-counterpoint/</link>
	<description>...is a freelance journalist based in Brisbane, Australia. This is his portfolio of published work.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 06:17:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcmillen.com/2009/11/07/fan-sourcing-filmmaker-creativity-a-counterpoint/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmcmillen.com/?p=1026#comment-548</guid>
		<description>As an aspiring photographer (both music and other), this is an argument I struggle to come to terms with.

On the one hand, I agree. This kind of approach - similar to newbie photographers giving away their work &#039;for the credit&#039; or &#039;for the exposure&#039; - does have some impact on more established professionals&#039; ability to make a buck.

On the other hand - not so much, for a couple of reasons. Firstly, if someone is willing to give away their product, who are you to deny them that? Don&#039;t assume that anyone who gives away content is a clueless newbie who is being taken advantage of. They could be doing it for any number of reasons.

Secondly, if you can&#039;t change your business model to continue to be successful in a changing climate, then perhaps you should look for a different business. Stop whining about naive newcomers taking your business and concentrate on finding and promoting your competitive advantage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an aspiring photographer (both music and other), this is an argument I struggle to come to terms with.</p>
<p>On the one hand, I agree. This kind of approach &#8211; similar to newbie photographers giving away their work &#8216;for the credit&#8217; or &#8216;for the exposure&#8217; &#8211; does have some impact on more established professionals&#8217; ability to make a buck.</p>
<p>On the other hand &#8211; not so much, for a couple of reasons. Firstly, if someone is willing to give away their product, who are you to deny them that? Don&#8217;t assume that anyone who gives away content is a clueless newbie who is being taken advantage of. They could be doing it for any number of reasons.</p>
<p>Secondly, if you can&#8217;t change your business model to continue to be successful in a changing climate, then perhaps you should look for a different business. Stop whining about naive newcomers taking your business and concentrate on finding and promoting your competitive advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darragh</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcmillen.com/2009/11/07/fan-sourcing-filmmaker-creativity-a-counterpoint/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Darragh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmcmillen.com/?p=1026#comment-546</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Thats what I thought when I read about the Genero.tv thing. It is like reality tv for music videos - no overheads, people do all the work for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Thats what I thought when I read about the Genero.tv thing. It is like reality tv for music videos &#8211; no overheads, people do all the work for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

