<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fan-sourcing filmmaker creativity: a counterpoint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewmcmillen.com/2009/11/07/fan-sourcing-filmmaker-creativity-a-counterpoint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewmcmillen.com/2009/11/07/fan-sourcing-filmmaker-creativity-a-counterpoint/</link>
	<description>..lives in Brisbane, Australia. He talks to fascinating people and discusses music, writing and the web.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcmillen.com/2009/11/07/fan-sourcing-filmmaker-creativity-a-counterpoint/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmcmillen.com/?p=1026#comment-548</guid>
		<description>As an aspiring photographer (both music and other), this is an argument I struggle to come to terms with.

On the one hand, I agree. This kind of approach - similar to newbie photographers giving away their work 'for the credit' or 'for the exposure' - does have some impact on more established professionals' ability to make a buck.

On the other hand - not so much, for a couple of reasons. Firstly, if someone is willing to give away their product, who are you to deny them that? Don't assume that anyone who gives away content is a clueless newbie who is being taken advantage of. They could be doing it for any number of reasons.

Secondly, if you can't change your business model to continue to be successful in a changing climate, then perhaps you should look for a different business. Stop whining about naive newcomers taking your business and concentrate on finding and promoting your competitive advantage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an aspiring photographer (both music and other), this is an argument I struggle to come to terms with.</p>
<p>On the one hand, I agree. This kind of approach - similar to newbie photographers giving away their work &#8216;for the credit&#8217; or &#8216;for the exposure&#8217; - does have some impact on more established professionals&#8217; ability to make a buck.</p>
<p>On the other hand - not so much, for a couple of reasons. Firstly, if someone is willing to give away their product, who are you to deny them that? Don&#8217;t assume that anyone who gives away content is a clueless newbie who is being taken advantage of. They could be doing it for any number of reasons.</p>
<p>Secondly, if you can&#8217;t change your business model to continue to be successful in a changing climate, then perhaps you should look for a different business. Stop whining about naive newcomers taking your business and concentrate on finding and promoting your competitive advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darragh</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcmillen.com/2009/11/07/fan-sourcing-filmmaker-creativity-a-counterpoint/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Darragh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmcmillen.com/?p=1026#comment-546</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Thats what I thought when I read about the Genero.tv thing. It is like reality tv for music videos - no overheads, people do all the work for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Thats what I thought when I read about the Genero.tv thing. It is like reality tv for music videos - no overheads, people do all the work for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
